Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AKSHAY SRIVASTAVA versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


AKSHAY SRIVASTAVA v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 7762 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3080 (5 December 2006)

In The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

At

Jaipur Bench, Jaipur

ORDER

In

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7762/2006

Akshay Srivastava Vs. State of Rajasthan 5th December, 2006

Date Of Order ::

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal

Mr. Shashi Bushan Gupta, counsel for petitioner.

Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. ....................

Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material produced during the course of arguments.

Learned counsel for accused petitioner contended that a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act is pending before the trial court and on 31/10/2006 the accused petitioner could not appear because he had to go out of Kota for some urgent work and an application for exemption from personal attendance mentioning the above reasons was moved before the trial court but the same was dismissed. It is also submitted that the accused petitioner never intended to keep himself absent from the court but because of unforeseen reasons he could not appear on that day.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

Having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, the accused petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court on 11/12/2006 before 11'o clock and if moves an application for grant of bail, the same may be disposed of expeditiously, as far as possible on the same day, in accordance to law, after considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case. Till then the warrant of arrest issued against the accused petitioner by the trial court shall not be executed.

The bail application stands disposed of accordingly.

(J.R. Goyal),J

VS Shekhawat/-

Jr. P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.