BALRAM versus TEHSILDAR PAHADI DISTT BHARATP

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

BALRAM v TEHSILDAR PAHADI DISTT BHARATP - CSA Case No. 175 of 2003 [2006] RD-RJ 3081 (5 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

ORDER

IN

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.175/2003

Balram S/o Shri Brijgopal ...plaintiff-appellant

Versus

Tehsildar, Tehsil-Pahadi & Another ...defendant-respondents

Date of Order ::: 05.12.2006

Present

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain

Shri Abhishek Moondia, Advocate, for

Shri Rajesh Moondia, Counsel for appellant ####

By the Court:-

Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court. The judgment and decree passed by the lower court has been affirmed by the first appellate court also.

I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and after considering his submissions in the light of the findings of both the courts below I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this second appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine.

(Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.