High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
BALRAM v TEHSILDAR PAHADI DISTT BHARATP - CSA Case No. 175 of 2003  RD-RJ 3081 (5 December 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.175/2003
Balram S/o Shri Brijgopal ...plaintiff-appellant
Tehsildar, Tehsil-Pahadi & Another ...defendant-respondents
Date of Order ::: 05.12.2006
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain
Shri Abhishek Moondia, Advocate, for
Shri Rajesh Moondia, Counsel for appellant ####
By the Court:-
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction, which was dismissed by the lower court. The judgment and decree passed by the lower court has been affirmed by the first appellate court also.
I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and after considering his submissions in the light of the findings of both the courts below I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this second appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed in limine.
(Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.