Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHURA LAL AND ORS versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BHURA LAL AND ORS v STATE - CRLA Case No. 1206 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3084 (5 December 2006)

In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

At

Jaipur Bench, Jaipur

ORDER

In

S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1206/2006

Bhura Lal and others Vs. State of Rajasthan

Date Of Order :: 5.12.2006

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal

Mr. D.S. Jhala, counsel for appellants.

Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. .....................

Heard. Admit. Call for the record.

Heard learned counsel for accused appellants and learned Public

Prosecutor for the State on the prayer for suspension of sentence awarded to the accused appellants and perused the judgment of the court below

Learned counsel for accused appellants contended that accused appellants have been convicted for the offence under sections 326, 323/34 and 326/34 IPC and maximum sentence awarded is three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/-. It is also submitted that during the course of trial the accused appellants were on bail and at present their sentence has been suspended by the trial court for a period of one month.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.

Without expressing any opinion on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar and entire facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to suspend the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused appellants till disposal of this appeal.

It is, therefore, ordered that the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused appellants Bhura Lal, Sho Lal, Phool Chand and Bhag

Chand shall remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before this Court on 3rd January, 2007 and whenever called upon to do so.

(J.R. Goyal),J.

VS Shekhawat/-

Jr.P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.