Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT SUMANPURI versus HUKUMCHAND

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT SUMANPURI v HUKUMCHAND - CSA Case No. 620 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3296 (20 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

ORDER

IN

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.620/2006

Smt. Sumanpuri W/o Shri Kishanpuri ...defendant-appellant

Versus

Hukumchand S/o late Shri Kishanlal ...plaintiff-respondent

Date of Order ::: 20.12.2006

Present

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Jain

Shri Akhil Simlote, Counsel for defendant-appellant

Shri Kishanpuri, husband of defendant-appellant Smt.

Sumanpuri, present-in-person

Shri Ramesh Kumawat, Counsel for plaintiff-respondent ####

By the Court:-

Shri Akhil Simlote, learned counsel for the defendant-appellant, has produced a written-compromise dated 17.12.2006, wherein it is mentioned that the possession of the disputed premises has already been handed over to the respondent on 17.12.2006. The copy of the compromise is taken on the record.

The learned counsel for the defendant-appellant does not press this appeal in terms of the above compromise.

The second appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.

(Narendra Kumar Jain) J. //Jaiman//


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.