Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JABHAR versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JABHAR v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 7717 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3304 (21 December 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPL. NO.7717/2006

Jabbar Khan V. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Date of order ::: December 21, 2006

PRESENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PREM SHANKER ASOPA

Mr.Amir Aziz, for the applicant.

Mr.B.L. Avasthi, PP for the State.

This is a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of FIR

No.356/2006 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence under Section 307, 326, 324, 341 IPC and Section 3 & 2 (V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public

Prosecutor and perused the material / case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case..

The submission of counsel for the applicant is that the injured has suffered one grievous injury and three other sharp weapon injuries, but all the aforesaid injuries are on non-vital parts of the body. He also submits that dispute was with regard to allotting turn number to the local Buses and there was no intention to cause any injury.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that it is not a fit case for grant of bail.

Without expressing any opinion on the aforesaid submissions on merits and demerits of the case and taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant.

It is, therefore, ordered that applicant Jabbar Khan S/o Shri Hussain

Khan shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court as and when called upon to do so during pendency of the trial against him arising out of FIR No.356/2006 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur.

(PREM SHANKER ASOPA) J. ummed/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.