Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHAND MAL SHAH versus KALYAN MAL

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CHAND MAL SHAH v KALYAN MAL - CFA Case No. 72 of 1996 [2006] RD-RJ 37 (5 January 2006)

,

-:: ::- : :

" $& " $) : 72/1996 + - 96 3 5 +

***** ) : 5 :, 2006

-: + :-

" + " =

B D G B KG N,

E

E PE D G B E T

E

B GB, ] 3^ _ 5 23.3.1996 ^ B ` _: B D K ^

B E NE D ^ E PE D N ND : GBd E ] _- 5E `

E i _: _ N

P ^ NE 1.2.1985 N _: E 12,000/- G _ ^ _ B _: E 31.3.1985 N E

B _ 5 E _: E _: E _

E _: N KK_]

E NED pD: ` B _

E 1.2.1985 N NE: ND 5 B_ B _: E _: E ` : B ^ E _ E

B _: N P ^ NE 16.5.1985 N B 22,500/- _:

E _: N G _ _ 5 30.6.1985 N _ E

B E 30.6.1985 E .22,500/- 30.6.1985 _: _: E _ _:

E

N KK_] 16.5.1985 N :5 G P ^ T NED pD: _N NE: ND B_` _:

E E ` : B

E E B _ E

N E N i d ` K , Exceeds Arrangement E K TD _ _: 12.9.1985 N _: N D] ND _

N ^ _ B :5 ^ 97.057/-

K _ _: E 3^ :

E _: E E _ E ` N B EE E, NE: ND

B_ _E E E _E E E : ^ _- ` E P E : ^ NE: ND, E B_ N] , D pE :5

E ` :5 E E, N TD E _

E ^ _ ^

K

N P E G GBd E ^ :

"1. _: E _: E _ 5 1.2.85 N 12,000/-

E _ G E 31.3.85 N _ E d ND B_ _ ^ 1- 1/2 E _E 2. _: E _: E _ 5 16.5.85 N 30,000/- E 22,500/- E 30.6.85 N _ E E K E E _: N _ B

N _NP P ND B_` _: `

E E _ ^ 3. _: K E i E :5 E 4. _: _: E 12,000/- E ^ 6570/-

E E E G :

E 5. _: _: E 52,500/- ^ 25,987.50

E G : 6. _ _ E K 7. KN" _: ^ E B ` B. 1

E _] 1 E _] 20 _ E B _] _: ^ E N E :5 K GBd _NP P ^ KE _ _:

E E _ 97,057/- E ^ _ E _ 3^ ,

E

B E ^

B ` _NP P ^ KB , B N

N B D d ] _] 2

NE: ND ` :5 d , ` P ^ _ B EDE E 622373, _ 5 31.3.1985 _ 5 , N N ^ ` _]-2 G GBd E

E 3^ E ` pB B ^ P _ E ` d E E ` 12,000/- ^ NE: ND ^ ` N ], P ^ _ B

EDE E _ B 5 D ,

E Ep D E K i, E D B :5 i

K i NE: ND p K D :5 NE E ` :5 d , E E `

G ` N B D E p 1958 E 375 ( _E K _) E : N E PE D

E ] _ E ` _] K ` N K , : GBd _]

E NE d , B DE :5

G ` PE ... 1961 KB ND] 1655 (E _ .

K K ), 1956 KB ND] 12 (B...

E...D . .B.B..B E...D .)

E _ K EE : NE:

ND _]-2 ` P ^ _ B G ` E 622373,

E _ 5 31.3.1985 _ "B" E ":" ] _] , N NE: ND ` ^ ] :5 NB dB _E K _ (N) E ` _ E N _ d , ` ^ K dB .4500/- E dE K_: p 5 2007 ^ _

E _E E ^ ] 5 dB E NE: ND ^ ` :5 P ` _: K ]

(Unconditional undertaking) K G ` :5

E dP ` E G 2(5) D D N

E _]-2 5 , ` ] B K , N NE:

ND ^ ` :5 B ] NE: ND N `

B _]-7 12 ` ^ N ] :5 : _:K_ NE: ND ^ : ` _]-2 N ` GBd E

E _] B , dP N _E E K ,

B , N N E PE D

E

K i, ` _ _ _ E ` _] _ N G ` B

DE B ` B :5 ` :5 d B... E...D . .B.B..B E...D . (N) ` B 10 ` _

E :

"Where a document has been admitted in evidence by lower

Courts such admission cannot be called in question at any stage of the proceedings on the ground that it has not been duly stamped. The provisions of S.36, Stamp Act preclude the appellant from raising any objection against the admission of the document at appellate stage."

B B E

E _ . K K (N) E ` B B 4 ` _ :

"Where a question as to the admissibility of a document is raised on the ground that it has not been stamped or has not been properly stamped, the party challenging the admissibility of the document has to be alert to see that the document is not admitted in evidence by the Court. The Court has to judicially determine the matter as soon as the document is tendered in evidence and before it is marked as an exhibit in the case. Once a document has been marked as an exhibit in the case and has been used by the parties in examination and cross-examination of their witnesses, S.36 comes into operation. Once a document has been admitted in evidence, as aforesaid, it is not open either to the Trial Court itself or to a Court of Appeal or Revision to go behind that order. Such an order is not one of those judicial orders which are liable to be reviewed or revised by the same court or a court of superior jurisdiction. "

B N P N _E E

E K , _ E _] K ` K , G 36 D D G p

E PE B

N P N _E E

E K , i N

B D OE E :5

E p5 _ E ` K , G ` B DE EE

G N :5 ` K K B E N ` _

NE: ND G : :5 _ N E

E 1.2.1985 N _: N 12,000/- _ G _E dE _: E 31.3.1985 N _ E B d , E _: E _: B N _ 1.2.1985 N

E : _: E 12,000/- ^ NED pD: NE: ND 12,000/-

E

B_ B _: E ` : B _: B 16.5.1985 N 30,000/- 5 22,500/- _ _ _NP P

E _: _: E _ _: N KK_]

E E 16.5.1985 N :5 G P ^ T NED pD: _N

E

NE: ND B_` E 30,000/- 22,500/- _:

E ` _: E : B E

E _ E B ` _ E G E i NE: ND _: ^ E E _] 1, 6 11 K i B _ B ^ B_` B _] 3, 8 13 K NE: ND T NED pD: d , E _: K `

E E

B :5 E N B ED : :5 _] 3 E 12,000/- ^ _ B ^ N 1.2.1985 E

B N _: E ` _: _ E : ^ _ B 31.3.1985 N NB dB, N E ` : _]

B E _] 6 13 B _: ^ E K i, ^ _ B 30.6.1985 N 30,000/- ^ 22,500/- ^ NB dB

N E E _: _ ` E G d

NE: ND NE: ND T NED pD:

E : d B_`, E NE: ND _: ^

E B K i B^ ] , N B D , ` i N :5

N B D _ ] _ _ p ` :5 P ] 1.2.1985 N _: dB _ 16.2.1988 N E : B 12,000/- E

E E

G ` N B D E B i

E ] :5 p5 ` E _ G , N 1.2.1985 N _: dB, ^ B_ _] 3 E _ B ^ : 31.3.1985 E E _ ` _ _] 1 E 3 G _ _ :5 5 30,000/- 5 22,500/- , 16.5.1985 ^ E _ B ^ : 30.5.1985 , G ` _ _ ` , ` N B _ :5 N

B D B E i :5 p5

E ]

N B D B ] _: p p : E_E GG G `

PE d p : G ^ G 2(15), 11, 26, 27 29 ^ ] p 1988 (1) E 615 ( : _ E_ K )

E ] _: E

NE: ND _:

E _: E E N ` B

B E E B _ E

E i E

N ^ G : E_E GG

E

K :5 E ` EE ^ :5 dB, _: ` N B E E :5

N N _E E K , ]

E _: K : GG

E d , : _: N _

E G :5 : N E PE D

E ] K :

G ` N B _ E ` :5

E d,

GBd ` ^ ^ B DE

EE G B D N :5 B ] ` _ E ` 5NG G `

E d] - ] _E 6 17 _ 5 4.7.1996 N E

E d d K : G EE

E

G ` d] ^ dB, E E

E

K _ 5 25.9.1996 N _: d] - _ _: N E G :5

N E PE D E _E _ 5 25.9.1996

E ^ ] N B D ` ] pB , N B B

G ` EE : d K : G 5P pB

K , E: ` pB :5 pB

P G ` _: N

E E ` d _: K

K : GG d K : G ` G 2(10) N K ^ _:

E E N

B _ K : E_E GG d G ` d ` N E

N K _: N `

E B N

E E 1-2 _ E E

E i ` _: N _N-B E NE: ND _:

E E dB, E :5 _: K N K :

GG N K : GGE ,

E E

N ` P ^ B5 ` :5 NE :5 NE E _: N G

E E :5 _: K : GG N _: ^ N B E ]

E :5 ^ N B D ] _: K K : GG

E

K : E :5 d , B D :5

P _ E ` N B :5

E

P ` N G : E i ` _ E ` N 5NG d E E _E E _ 5 25.9.1996 N _ E ]

E :5 _: K N K :

GG N -_N

K

G _E K ^ : ` :5 , iE

K : GGE ` ^

E NB : N

B D BE E B i :5

E ]

N :5

E i EE _: ^ GBd ] N

E _: B. 1 E E N ` _ N

NE E 12,000/- ` G _ dE EED E K 5_ E 31.3.1985 N d i E B _ d N _]-1

NED pD: ` NE: ND (_] 2) B_ (_] 3) B dB N i ` d , ^ _] 4 , E :5 P i ` :5 dB N

K _] 5 B _ N 30,000/- _

E 30.6.1985 E _ d E B _ _ E i ^ NED pD: NE: ND d N _] 7 ,E B E E N `

B_ _] 8 B ^ E B

": : i, ` 5

E , E E K _ d ^ _] 9 E B _ N K , ^ i ^ _] 10 _ N 22,500/- G _ dE,

EED 30.6.1985 E d i _ E

E E _ d E _] 11 , E B _ _ E i P ^ NED pD: ` NE: ND d N _] 12 ^ B_ _] 13 _ E N B

E i ` E , N _ N

K , _ E B E

E i _: N

ND B _ N _] 18 E 20 E i

K d , N _ E ` _] E K , ` N B B :5 B ^ E N

E

B E _: ^ : N :5

E

GBd ^ 1 E 6 _:

E ` ^ _ _ ` B GBd p] p 5 ]

E `

E i N G :5

E , B B D ` N :5 NE E, B ^ B

N K 3^ ] E

( + = )

"..


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.