Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJE SINGH RAWAT versus RAJ.STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETI

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAJE SINGH RAWAT v RAJ.STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETI - CW Case No. 828 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 1728 (6 April 2007)

CW 828/07

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH [1] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.828/07

Raje Singh Rawat

Versus

Raj. State Agricultural Marketing Board & Anr. [2] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.829/07

Chunnilal

Versus

Raj. State Agricultural Marketing Board & Anr. [3] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5993/04

Smt. Usha Khandelwal & Anr.

Versus

State of Rajasthan & Anr.

DATE OF ORDER :: 06/04/2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Mr. R.C. Joshi ] for petitioners

Dr. P.C. Jain ]

Mr. R.A. Katta, for respondent-Board

Mr. B.K. Sharma, Dy.G.A. for State

***

Instant petitions have been filed by petitioners in regard to age of superannuation which they are claiming to be 60 yrs. in terms of

Regulation 20(2) of Service Bye-Laws, 1977.

CW 828/07

Division Bench has examined the controversy while examining the scheme of Bye-laws and so also its amendment whereby Clause 35-A was inserted in the Service Bye-Laws, 1977 on 22nd

February, 2007.

Since the controversy has been examined by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil Special Appeal [Writ] No.135/07 & connected matters, decided on 1st March, 2007, it no more remain res integra to examine the issue any further. The operative portion of the judgment is reproduced as under:

"The apprehension of the appellant, in our opinion, is unfounded. Nevertheless it requires clarifications. Having held that the retirement age of the employees of the Board was sixty years until 22.2.2007, the persons who have already retired on attaining the age of fifty eight years but have not attained age of sixty years as on that date have to be treated as members of the service. If they did not work during the period, they would not be entitled to salary but they would be entitled to notionally count the period as part of service and entitled to retiral benefits. Such of them who remained in active service and performed duties would be also entitled to the salary and other emoluments for the period upto 22.2.2007 or attaining the age of sixty years whichever was earlier".

CW 828/07

In view of judgment of Division Bench [supra], all the writ petitions stand disposed of and benefits, which petitioners are entitled for, be computed and paid to them within two months.

No order as to costs. [AJAY RASTOGI],J.

FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.