Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HUKMA RAM versus HOLA RAM & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


HUKMA RAM v HOLA RAM & ORS. - CRLR Case No. 445 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 1812 (10 April 2007)

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.445/2006

(Hukma Ram Vs. Mola Ram & Ors.)

Date of order : 10.4.2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS

Mr. K.R. Bhati, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order impugned.

The revisional court vide impugned order dated 8.3.2006 set aside the order passed by the learned trial court dated 8.7.2005 whereby cognizance was taken against the non-petitioners for offence under Section 500 I.P.C. Learned revisional court after perusing the statement found that there is no specific allegations which constitute offence under

Section 500 I.P.C. and found that it is a case in which no offence for taking cognizance under Section 500 I.P.C. is made out against the non-petitioners.

It is also observed that in between the parties, there is enmity with regard to other dispute of property.

I see no reason to interfere with the order passed by the revisional court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

(GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J. arun


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.