High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
MANISH KUMAR v STATE - CRLMA Case No. 192 of 2007  RD-RJ 1859 (11 April 2007)
S.B.Cr.AppealNo.282/2006 in Cri.M.A.No.192/07
Manish Kumar vs State of Rajasthan
DATE OF ORDER :- 11.4.07
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE CHATRA RAM JAT
Mr. M.K.Garg, counsel for the appellant.
Mr. JPS Choudhary, Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that as per judgment of trial Court dated 10.3.2006 the motor cycle Bajaj
CT 100 No.RJ 13 SA 2123 has been ordered to be given on supurdginama ,while already order was passed on7.1.06 but unfortunately the trial Court vide order dated 16.9.06 having admitted the fact of that order but application handing over said motor cycle on supurdginama was rejected so it is prayed that, that order should be quashed and as per order dated 10.3.06 said motor cycle be released on supurdginama.
Learned Public Prosecutor has nothing to say about this.
In view of the trial court's judgment dated 10.3.06 and order dated 7.1.06 in respect of said motor cycle Bajaj CT 100 No.RJ SA 2123 , the order dated 16.9.2006 cannot be upheld and is hereby quashed.
Accordingly,the application dated 6.4.207 filed by the appellant is allowed and record of the case be sent forthwith for releasing the said motor cycle Bajaj CT 100 No.RJ SA 2123. After making compliance of this order, record of this case may be sent back to this Court.
(CHATRA RAM JAT)J.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.