VISHNA RAM versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

VISHNA RAM v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 10 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 199 (9 January 2007)

S.B.CR MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.10/2007

Date : 09.01.2007

HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK,J.

Mr. B.S. Rathore for the applicant.

Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for State.

I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. +

Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case while taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case and the allegation against the accused applicant that he was escorting the vehicle in which contraband material was recovered which was above commercial quantity, therefore, I do not feel inclined to extend benefit of bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the bail application moved by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. stands rejected. However, the applicant shall be free to move regular bail application before the learned trial court after recording of statements of the material witnesses.

(SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.