Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHANWAR LAL versus STATE & ANR

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BHANWAR LAL v STATE & ANR - CRLR Case No. 194 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 2070 (18 April 2007)

(1)

Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR :ORDER:

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.194/2006.

(Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.)

April 18th ,

DATE OF ORDER : 2007

PRESENT

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gopal Krishan Vyas ___________________________________

Mr. Rakesh Arora for the petitioner.

Mr. S.N. Tiwari, P.P.

BY THE COURT :

By this petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 24.02.2006 whereby the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur allowed the the bail appeal under Section 52, Juvenile Justice

Act, filed against the order of the learned Chief Judl. Magistrate,

Jodhpur.

Vide the impugned order, the learned appellate Court

(2)

Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another granted bail to the non-petitioner No.2 Gopal Singh, who was juvenile at the time of commission of the offence, following the judgment of this Court reported in 1989 Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 560,

Rajesh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan.

The complainant petitioner has challenged the above order on the ground that the case was of serious nature and the learned Sessions Judge without considering the evidence on record simply proceeded on the basis that at the time of the commission of the offence non-petitioner No.2 was juvenile whereas he ought to have considered the gravity of the offence in the present case wherein capital punishment is provided for the alleged offence. According to the pretitioner, the learned

Sessions Judge has committed error in granting bail to the non- petitioner No.2.

By way of filing S.B. Criminal Revision Petition

No.137/2006, decided on 29.03.2007, the complainant petitioner challenged the order passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Balotra, wherein the impugned order dated 18.01.2006 was upheld and it was held that at the time of the commission of the offence non-petitioner

No.2 was juvenile. Admittedly, non-petitioner No.2 is facing trial before the Juvenile Justice Board, Jodhpur. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to interfere with the

(3)

Bhanwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another order dated 24.02.2006 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in the Criminal (Bail) Appeal.

Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed.

(Gopal Krishan Vyas) J.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.