Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S SHYAM DISTRIBUTORS versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S SHYAM DISTRIBUTORS v STATE - CRLR Case No. 1031 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 212 (10 January 2007)

//1//

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

JUDGMENT

(1) S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1031/2006

M/S SHYAM DISTRIBUTOR & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ANR.

(2) S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 0492/2006

M/S PUSHPA OIL MILLS Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ANR.

(3) S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 0496/2006

M/S PARWATI OIL MILLS & ANR. Vs. STATE OF RAJ. & ANR. &

(4) S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 0498/2006

M/S SHIVSHANKER OIL COMP. & ANR. Vs. STATE & ANR.

DATE: 10.01.2007.

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Shahdadpuri for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, PP for the State.

****

Since all these revision petitions involve similar question of law, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.

The facts of the case of M/s Shyam Distributor are taken as leading case. All the petitioners are edible oil distributors and vide judgment dated 30.06.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge

No.2, Ajmer, the appeal of the petitioner has been allowed with certain terms and conditions which are as under:- //2// 1) 1,50,000/- 2)

- (undertaking) , 1998

"

This revision petition is preferred by the petitioners against the conditions which are imposed by the Appellate Court.

I find no illegality in the impugned judgment passed by the Appellate Court and if the petitioners goods are found fit to be sold for consumption of human being, on such eventuality, the petitioners are at liberty to move application before the Court concerned for releasing the goods which have been given on 'Supurdaginama'.

In view of the aforesaid observations, all the revision petitions fail and the same are hereby dismissed having no merit.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.