Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUST.PATASI AND ORS versus B O R, AJMER AND ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MUST.PATASI AND ORS v B O R, AJMER AND ORS - CW Case No. 2938 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 2183 (24 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL WRIT No. 2938 of 2007

SAMAST GRAMVASI OF GRAM JHORDA

V/S

STATE & ORS.

Mr. GR PUNIA, for the appellant / petitioner

Mr. MAHIPAL BISHNOI, for the respondent

Dr.SACHIN ACHARYA for respondent No.3.

Date of Order : 2.11.2007

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

HON'BLE SHRI MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In our view, it cannot be said to be a Public Interest

Litigation. The petitioners, if feel aggrieved, of any action of the respondent No. 3, they may seek their remedies in appropriate forum, in accordance with appropriate law. However, we are not inclined to entertain this petition as Public Interest Litigation. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.

( MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI ),J. ( N P GUPTA ),J. /mamta/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.