Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM PRATAP MEENA versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RAM PRATAP MEENA v STATE - CW Case No. 6212 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 2211 (25 April 2007)

CW 6212/06

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6212/06

Ram Pratap Meena Versus State & Ors.

DATE OF ORDER :: 25/04/2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Mr. Lokesh Sharma, for petitioner

Mr. B.K. Sharma, Dy.G.A.

***

Petitioner was initially elected as Ward

Panch and thereafter, Up Sarpanch of Gram

Panchayat Kherlirel. After notice being served upon him in regard to pre-election disqualification, the respondents conducted inquiry u/s.39(2) of Act, 1994 and finally held him to be disqualified vide order Ann.3 dated 5th

July, 2006.

The legal question raised before this court was as to whether a pre-election disqualification can be examined by the Government in exercise of its power u/s.39(2) of Act, 1994 or he can be disqualified only by way of election petition provided u/s.43 of the Act.

This Court in D.B. Civil Special Appeal [Writ] No.236/06, Smt. Sameera Bano Vs. State of

Rajasthan & two other connected matters, decided 2nd on April, 2007 finally held that a pre- election disqualification can be adjudicated only in an election petition before the District Judge u/s.43 of the Act read with Rule 80 of the

CW 6212/06

Election Rules and cannot be adjudicated by the authority under Rule 23 of the Rules.

In view of pronouncement made by this court as referred to supra, the order passed by respondents Ann.3 is not legally sustainable and accordingly, the writ petition succeeds and is hereby allowed. The order Ann.3 dated 5th July, 2006 is hereby quashed and set aside and the position of petitioner which he was holding on the date of passing of order be restored back. No order as to costs. [AJAY RASTOGI],J.

FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.