Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHAIN SINGH versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CHAIN SINGH v STATE - CRLR Case No. 529 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 229 (11 January 2007)

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 529/2006

CHAIN SINGH SHISHODIA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

DATE: 11.01.2007.

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J.

Mr. V.K. Mathur for the complainant-petitioner.

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, PP for the State.

****

This criminal revision petition under Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 14.02.2006 passed by the Additional

Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1, Jaipur District,

Jaipur in Sessions Case No. 76/2005, whereby the accused-respondents Gyarsi Lal, Nathu Lal and Bhanwar @

Bhonri Lal have been acquitted from the offences under

Sections 324, 326, 308 and 324/34 IPC and have been convicted under Sections 323 and 325/34 IPC and are extended the benefit of probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and have also carefully gone through the impugned judgment passed by Fast Track Judge and perused the relevant record.

(2)

As per the injury report, it is observed that the injuries sustained by Laxman is not grievous in nature, therefore, the accused are punished under

Sections 323 and 325/34 IPC and have rightly been acquitted from the offence under Sections 324, 326, 308 and 324/34 IPC and are rightly given the benefit of probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of

Offenders Act, 1958.

After thorough consideration of the impugned judgment and the relevant record, I find no illegality in the judgment dated 14.02.2006 and no interference whatsoever is required by this Court.

Consequently, the revision petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed.

Record be sent back forthwith.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.