SMT.SEEMA & ANR. versus STATE & ANR.

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SMT.SEEMA & ANR. v STATE & ANR. - CRLMP Case No. 140 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 2537 (8 May 2007)

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.140/2007

(Smt.Seema & Anr. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr.)

Date of order : : 08.05.2007

HON'BLE MR. KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA, J.

Mr.Ravi Bhansali, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyay, PP for the State.

Mr.Ramesh Purohit, for the respondent No.2

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of the FIR but the police after investigation has filed charge-sheet in this case. Therefore, this misc. petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, accused-petitioner is at liberty to raise all legal objections, if any before the learned lower court.

(KRISHAN KUMAR ACHARYA), J.

NK

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.