Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BAJRANG LAL versus KISHAN SINGH AND ANR

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BAJRANG LAL v KISHAN SINGH AND ANR - CRLR Case No. 804 of 2000 [2007] RD-RJ 2666 (15 May 2007)

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 804/2000

BAJRANG LAL Vs. KISHAN SINGH

DATE: 15.05.2007.

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J.

Mr. Arvind Sharma for

Mr. Anurag Sharma for the accused-petitioner.

****

None present for the respondent despite service.

The present criminal revision petition under

Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the accused-petitioner against the order dated 09.10.2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur City in Criminal Revision No. 18/99 as also against the order dated 15.11.2000 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr.

Division) & Judicial Magistrate, Bamanwas in Criminal

Case No. 202/2000, whereby cognizance for the offence under Section 500 IPC has been taken against the accused-petitioner.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner placed reliance on the judgment rendered by this Court in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 293/2003-

(2)

Ramswaroop & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., dated 22.02.2007.

Having heard learned counsel for the accused- petitioner and after going through the impugned order, in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to quash and set-aside the impugned order dated 09.10.2000 passed by the Revisional Court i.e. Additional Sessions

Judge, Gangapur City and the order dated 15.11.2000 passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) & Judicial

Magistrate, Bamanwas and remand the matter back to the

Revisional Court for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity of being heard to the accused-petitioner and in the light of judgment rendered by this Court in the aforementioned case of Ramswaroop & Ors. (supra) and shall pass fresh order in accordance with the provisions of law.

With these observation, the revision petition stands disposed of.

Record be sent back forthwith.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.