Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT SURJI DEVI versus STATE OF RAJ & ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT SURJI DEVI v STATE OF RAJ & ORS - CW Case No. 894 of 2004 [2007] RD-RJ 2766 (17 May 2007)

CW 894/04

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH [1] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.894/04

Smt. Surji Devi Versus State & Ors. [2] S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.556/04

Smt. Surji Devi Versus State & Ors.

DATE OF ORDER :: 17/05/2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Mr. Hanuman Choudhary, for petitioner

Mr. Arun Sharma, Dy.G.A.

***

Instant petitions have been filed by petitioner, who was Ex-Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat

Bhadhadar, Panchayat Samiti Dhod, District Sikar, against the order Ann.7 10th February, 2004 of

Divisional Commissioner whereby petitioner was declared to be disqualified after holding inquiry under Rules.

Her only grievance is that recovery which has been ordered under the order impugned is not legally sustainable.

From perusal of order Ann.7, finding has been recorded after explanation was called for from petitioner. The authority was not satisfied and after taking holding inquiry finally opined that a sum of Rs.41363/- is required to be recovered from her and as a consequence thereof being held guilty for the irregularities committed, she was

CW 894/04 disqualified as well. Disqualification recorded under order impugned has not been questioned.

I have gone through the order impugned dated 10th February, 2004 in which details have been furnished on account of which recovery has been ordered by the competent authority and the same is duly supported by material on record and this court is of the opinion that the amount which was sought to be recovered from petitioner does not call for interference by this court under the order impugned.

Consequently, the writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI],J.

FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.