Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BASIR MOHAMMED versus R S R T C

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BASIR MOHAMMED v R S R T C - CMA Case No. 48 of 2005 [2007] RD-RJ 3165 (5 July 2007)

D.B. CIVIL(MATRIMONIAL) APPEAL NO. 48/2005

(Ladu Ram Vs. Smt. Sushila) 29.5.2006

HON'BLE MR RAJESH BALIA, J.

HON'BLE MR R.P. VYAS,J.

Mr. M.L. Panwar, for the appellant/s

Mr. D.K. Parihar, for the respondent/s

This case may be listed for orders in Chamber on 14.7.2006. On that day both the parties are directed to remain present alongwith their children.

(R.P.VYAS), J. (RAJESH BALIA),J. /rm

D.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 533/2005

(Ghanshyam Soni Vs. Smt. Nilu Soni and Ors.) 29.5.2006

HON'BLE MR RAJESH BALIA, J.

HON'BLE MR R.P. VYAS,J.

None present for the appellant/s

Mr. Narendra Singh for the respondent/s

On 25.5.2006, the matter was called out but no one appeared. Today, the matter was called out but no one appeared. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(R.P.VYAS), J. (RAJESH BALIA),J. /rm

D.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 720/2005

(Ashok Kumar Rakhecha Vs. Smt. Geetika) 29.5.2006

HON'BLE MR RAJESH BALIA, J.

HON'BLE MR R.P. VYAS,J.

None present for the appellant/s

On 22.11.2005, the matter was called out but no one appeared. On 9.1.2006, the matter was called out but no one appeared. Again on 1.2.2.006 and 25.5.2006, no one appeared. Today, the matter was called out but no one appeared. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(R.P.VYAS), J. (RAJESH BALIA),J. /rm

D.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 781/2005 29.5.2006

HON'BLE MR RAJESH BALIA, J.

HON'BLE MR R.P. VYAS,J.

None present for the appellant/s

To be continued in the list.

(R.P.VYAS), J. (RAJESH BALIA),J. /rm

The record of this case was called for and S.D.O. was present in the Court with the record, however, during the course of hearing he has left out the Court and record is in his possession. Notice may be issued for personal appearance on 31.5.2006 as to why it should be treated contempt of Court.

In pursuance of notice issued to the S.D.M. on 29.5.2006, the S.D.M.

Appeared before the Court and is present in person and has tendered unconditional apology.

In view thereof, the notice is discharged with the note that the respondent be careful in future.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.