Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANISH versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MANISH v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 2432 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 3317 (12 July 2007)

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2432/2007

(Manish Vs. State of Rajasthan)

DATE OF ORDER : 12/07/2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J.

Mr. S.K.Poonia for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Upadhayay, Public Prosecutor for State.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it was co-accused Ashok who caused the injuries to the complainant as also extorted money amounting to Rs. 1750/- and no role has been assigned to the present petitioner.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the main allegation is against co-accused Ashok who alleged to have caused injuries to the complainant and extorted money and having considered the oral arguments advanced by the parties, I consider it just and proper to allow the bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 438

Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application filed by the petitioner u/s 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Manish S/o Mewa Singh in FIR No. 125/2007

P.S. Rajgarh, he shall be released on bail for a period till the police concludes the investigation and files the challan provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- along with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of

Investigating Officer to surrender and appear before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan after conclusion of the investigation on the following conditions:-

(i)That he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii)That he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and;

(iii)That he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

The petitioner shall surrender before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan and move a regular bail.

(H.R.PANWAR), J. rp


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.