Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JASWANT SINGH & ORS. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JASWANT SINGH & ORS. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 3206 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 3369 (16 July 2007)

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.3206/2007

(Jaswant Singh & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan)

DATE OF ORDER : July 16, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.N.S.Bhati, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor for State.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the

Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the complainant installed a cabin near to bus stand through which, the illicit liquor is said to have been sold, to which the villagers have opposed. There was an agitation of the villagers for the removal of the encroachment as also opposing the sale of the illicit liquor at the bus stand by installing the illegal cabin.

Be that as it may, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the petitioners, I consider it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners Jaswant Singh s/o Ram Singh, Raju Singh s/o

Ranidan Singh, Devi Singh s/o Sangsingh, Devi Singh s/o

Jagman Singh, Bagh Singh s/o Kishore Singh, Madan Singh s/o

Roop Singh and Kumbharam s/o Natthu Ram in FIR No.74/2007,

P.S., Balesar, they shall be released on bail for a period till the police concludes the investigation and files the challan provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of

Rs.10,000/- along with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer to surrender and appear before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan after conclusion of the investigation on the following conditions:-

(i)That they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii)That they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and;

(iii)That they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

The petitioners shall surrender before the trial court on the date of filing of the challan.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.