SATTAR KHAN & ANR. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SATTAR KHAN & ANR. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 2795 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 3465 (19 July 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 2795/2007

(Sattar Khan and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : 19/7/2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J.

Mr. R.S.Chundawat for the petitioners.

Mr. Vishnu Kachhawaha Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Sattar Khan S/o Hera Ji Sohi and Jamal S/o Indu Ji Sohi be released on bail in FIR No. 33/07 P.S.

Bhim, district Rajsamand, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(H.R.PANWAR), J.

RP

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.