High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
KALU RAM v SMT.SUMATI & ORS. - CMA Case No. 1928 of 2006  RD-RJ 3655 (30 July 2007)
S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 1928/2006 30th July, 2007
Date of order :
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Mr. Parikshit Nayak, for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Johari (Insurer) for the respondent.
Nobody has appeard for the claimants despite service.
Mr. Parikshit Nayak, learned counsel for the appellant candidly submits that in view of the nature of the impugned order the competence of this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act remains questionable. Learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this appeal and seeks liberty to take recourse to proper remedy in accordance with law. Permission granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(DINESH MAHESHWARI),J. s.soni
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.