Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

UMAID KUMAR versus STATE & ANR

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


UMAID KUMAR v STATE & ANR - CRLMP Case No. 754 of 2003 [2007] RD-RJ 3968 (14 August 2007)

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 754/2003

Date : 14.08.2007

HON'BLE MR. BHAGWATI PRASAD, J.

Mr. Ranjeet Joshi for the petitioner.

Mr. Moolchandani for the State. ====

Heard.

Similar misc. petitions have already been decided by this

Court in the matter of Rishi & Ors. Vs. State & Anr. (S.B. Criminal Misc.

Petition No. 753/2003) decided on 15.12.2006. It was a case where cognizance under Section 500 IPC was quashed. Similar controversy is involved in this case. The case of the petitioner proceeds on the basis of a complaint to the police. A citizen when gets his rights infringed, has a right to approach the police and they cannot fall within the definition of defamation. In that view of the matter, the present petition is covered by decision of this Court referred above.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. The order of taking cognizance against the petitioner dated 28.08.02 is quashed and set aside.

(BHAGWATI PRASAD), J. bjsh


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.