GOVERDHAN SINGH versus HARISINGH & ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

GOVERDHAN SINGH v HARISINGH & ORS - CMA Case No. 1047 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4115 (22 August 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No. 1047 of 2007

GOVERDHAN SINGH

V/S

HARISINGH & ORS

Mr. VINAY JAIN, for the appellant / petitioner

Mr. RAJESH JOSHI, for the respondent

Date of Order : 22.8.2007

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order.

It is not the averment of the plaintiff-appellant that he has sown any crop on the land, while according to the defendants, they had sown the crop. The suit was filed on 10.7.2006. The Commissioner on 12.8.2006 had found the

Jawar crop to be existing with the height of the plant to be 5 to 6 fts. In my view, in these circumstances, the impugned order doesn't require any interference in my appellate jurisdiction. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily.

( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.