Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BALESHWAR versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BALESHWAR v STATE - CRLR Case No. 339 of 1995 [2007] RD-RJ 425 (19 January 2007)

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 339/1995

BALESHWAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

DATE: 19.01.2007.

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J.

Ms. Kamla Jain with

Mr. Mahendra Singh for the accused-petitioner.

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma, PP for the State.

****

This revision petition under Section 397 r/w

Section 401 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment dated 19.07.95 passed by the Sessions Judge, Kota in

Criminal Appeal No. 5/94, whereby he upheld the judgment dated 06.01.94 passed by the Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Special Court (Communal Riots),

Kota in Criminal Case No. 168/93, by which the accused- petitioner has been convicted under Section 420 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and a fine of

Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the petitioner is facing trial since 1978 and had already

(2) remained in custody for about one month and keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of State of Maharastra Vs. Jagmohan Singh

Kuldeep Singh Anand & Others, reported in 2004(7) SCC 659, the accused-petitioner deserves to be let off on the period already undergone by him but the fine imposed upon him is required to be enhanced to meet the ends of justice.

In the result, the present revision petition is partly allowed and the conviction of the accused- petitioner Baleshwar S/o Shri Mangilal under Section 420 IPC is upheld and confirmed but the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon him is reduced to the period already undergone by him and the fine is enhanced to

Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine the petitioner will have to undergo the sentence as awarded by the Appellate Court.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.