Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KANTI LAL & ORS. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KANTI LAL & ORS. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 4151 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4255 (30 August 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4151/2007

(Kanti Lal & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : August 30, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that similarly situated co-accused viz. Bhagwan Lal, Poonam

Chand, Heera Lal, Narayan, Gopal, Kanwar Lal, Balu, have been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioners is not distinguishable from that of co-accused, who have already been granted bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the similarly situated co-accused have already been granted bail, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439

Cr.P.C. is allowed and the petitioners Kanti Lal s/o Bhagwan

Dangi, Shankar Lal s/o Bagdi Ram Dangi, Ram Chandra s/o

Ganga Ram Dangi, Chain Ram s/o Panna Lal Dangi, Kanhaiya Lal s/o Panna Lal Dangi, Jagdish s/o Poonam Chand Dangi, Ram Lal s/o Partha Dangi, Yudhishthar s/o Shankar Lal Dangi, Magan Lal s/o Ratan Lal Dangi, Ram Singh s/o Narayan Dangi and Ramesh s/o Bhagwan Lal Dangi be released on bail in FIR No.253/2007,

P.S. Arnod provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.