High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
SMT.KACHARI & ANR. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 4499 of 2007  RD-RJ 4524 (12 September 2007)
S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 4499/2007
(Smt. Kachari & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Date of order : 12/09/2007
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J.
Mr. P.R.Mehta for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public
Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and challan papers. I have carefully gone through the FIR lodged by Kachru and postmortem report of the deceased.
The allegation of causing injuries are specifically against Lala and Gulab. Though in the FIR, Harish has been named but in statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C., the first informant stated that the injury has been caused by Gulab by sword and name of Harish has been inadvertently mentioned.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no specific injury has been assigned to the present petitioners and the petitioners are ladies, having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail.
Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Smt. Kachari W/o Lala and
Smt. Kali W/o Gulab Ji be released on bail in FIR No. 151/2007 P.S.
Sadar, district Banswara, provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.