Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NATHU LAL RAIGER versus THE ADDI CIVIL JUDGE (J D)JAIP

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


NATHU LAL RAIGER v THE ADDI CIVIL JUDGE (J D)JAIP - CW Case No. 6087 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4560 (14 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6087/2007

NATHU LAL RAIGER

Vs.

THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.), JAIPUR DISTRICT,

JAIPUR & ORS.

Date: 14.09.2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RATHORE

Mr. R.K. Daga for the petitioners.

Mr. G. Bardhar for the respondents.

****

The matter comes up on the application under

Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India for seeking vacation of ex parte interim order dated 14.08.2007 granted by this Court.

At the request of both the parties, the matter is finally heard at this stage.

The respondent No.2 Mohari Lal filed an election petition before the District & Sessions Judge,

Jaipur District, Jaipur against the petitioner. In the election petition, the respondent No.2 has alleged that a Notification was issued by the Government of

Rajasthan for election of Sarpanch and Panch for the year 2005 and the counting was not properly made and corrupt and malpractices are adopted. The Additional

Civil Judge (Sr. Division) No.2, Jaipur District,

Jaipur has framed the following issues:-

"1- , 4.2.05

-1 ?

------ : 2- ? , 3- , , , ? 5000/- 4- ? ?" 5-

Vide judgment dated 06.08.2007, the Court below while deciding these issues, ordered for recounting and the said order dated 06.08.2007 has been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition.

It is alleged that total 2528 votes are casted and only 2527 votes are counted. It is also not disputed by the petitioner and the respondents that only difference of one vote is there and having considered each and every aspect the Court below thought it proper to order for recounting.

I find no illegality in the impugned order dated 06.08.2007 passed by the Additional Civil Judge

(Sr. Division) No.2, Jaipur District, Jaipur as the

Court below has considered the judgments referred by the respective parties and after considering each and every aspect, ordered for recounting, which requires no interference by this Court.

Consequently, the writ petition fails and the same is hereby dismissed.

The interim order dated 14.08.2007 granted by this Court stands rejected. The stay application also stands rejected.

The application under Article 226(3) of the

Constitution of India stands allowed.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.