Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABLU @ SHRAFAT ULLAH versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BABLU @ SHRAFAT ULLAH v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 3919 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4824 (27 September 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.3919/2007

(Bablu alias Shrafat-Ullah Khan vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : September 27, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.R.K.Charan, for the petitioner.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated with the aid of section 120-B I.P.C., however, there is absolutely no evidence of entering into a criminal conspiracy for committing the murder of

Giriraj against the petitioner. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co- accused Amin Khan, from whom a motorcycle, which was used by assailants, was recovered, has been granted bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dt. 20.7.2007 in

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.3157/2007.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that similarly situated co-accused Amin Khan has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner stands on better footing than of co-accused Amin Khan, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439

Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Bablu alias

Shrafat-Ullah Khan s/o Deran Khan be released on bail in FIR

No.17/2007, P.S. Pratapgarh provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.