SURESH KUMAR & ANR. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SURESH KUMAR & ANR. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 4603 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4853 (27 September 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.4603/2007

(Suresh Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : September 27, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.Sandeep Mehta, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State.

Mr.Dilip Kawadia, for the complainant.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public

Prosecutor for the State assisted by counsel for the complainant. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary.

From perusal of the investigation diary, it appears that the sale was executed in favour of petitioner No.1. Petitioner

No.2 is the attesting/identifying witness of the sale pertaining to have been executed by Mangi Lal. The admitted signature and the signatures on the agreement were examined by the handwriting expert and they were found to be forged.

Keeping in view the fact that there is prima facie involvement of both the petitioners in commission of the crime as per the police investigation diary, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.