Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


PARAS MAL v STATE - CRLR Case No. 282 of 1993 [2007] RD-RJ 487 (23 January 2007)

Parasmal vs. State of Rajasthan

(S.B.Criminal Revision No.282/93)

Dated:- 23.1.2007.


Mr.S.G.Ojha )

Mr.N.S.Rajpurohit) for the petitioner.

Mr.O.P.Rathi, Public Prosecutor.

This revision petition has been filed against the order of

Special Judge,Essential Commodities Act, Balotra dated 3.8.1993 by which among others charges against the petitioner have been framed u/s. 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act and u/s.411/34 IPC.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Public Prosecutor.

After framing of charges trial has commenced and statements of three witnesses have been recorded by the trial court.

The witnesses Gafoor, Kundanmal and Mohandas have named the petitioner in their statements recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C. and in view of this, it cannot be said that the charge against the petitioner is groundless. There is no ground for interference.

The revision petition stands dismissed accordingly.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.