Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHEEMA & ORS. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BHEEMA & ORS. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 4802 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 4948 (5 October 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.4802/2007

(Bheema & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : October 05, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr.Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioners.

Mr.Vishal Raj Mehta, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as the police investigation diary.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that in FIR no specific injury has been assigned to either of the petitioners and there is no injury, which is grievous in nature caused to the injured.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and contends that petitioners were armed with bamboo, iron pipe and stones and caused injuries to injured Bhera. He suffered as many as five injuries, one of which is grievous in nature.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and since the matter is at the investigation stage, in my view, at this stage, it is not just and proper to release the petitioners

No.1 and 2 on bail.

The bail application filed by petitioners No.1 Bheema and

No.2 Laliya is, therefore, dismissed. However, they are at liberty to file a fresh bail application after completion of the investigation.

However, so far as petitioner No.3 Kaliya alias Kalu, who alleged to have been armed with stones is concerned, no specific injury has been assigned to him. In the circumstances, therefore, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner No.3 Kaliya alias Kalu on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application filed by petitioner No.3

Kaliya alias Kalu under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner No.3 Kaliya alias Kalu s/o Partha Meena be released on bail in FIR No.317/2007, P.S. Salumber provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.