Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BAL BHARTI SANSTHAN & ANR. versus SMT.SUDHA BHARGAVA & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


BAL BHARTI SANSTHAN & ANR. v SMT.SUDHA BHARGAVA & ORS. - CR Case No. 192 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 5015 (10 October 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL REVISION No. 192 of 2007

BAL BHARTI SANSTHAN & ANR.

V/S

SMT.SUDHA BHARGAVA & ORS.

Mr. SAJJAN SINGH, for the appellant / petitioner

Mr. SRIKANT VERMA, Mr. JAGDISH VYAS & Mr. PS RATHORE, for the respondent

Date of Order : 10.10.2007

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the impugned order.

Learned counsel relied upon a judgment of this

Court in Adarsh Vidhya Mandir Samiti, Bharatpur & Anr. Vs.

Dharmpal Sharma reported in 2004(3) RLW (Raj.) 1852 to contend that such a suit for injunction is not maintanable.

In my view, the facts in Adarsh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti's case were entirely different, inasmuch as, in that case the relief claimed was for injunction seeking a direction to restrain the plaintiff from terminating the services and for a direction to regularise them, while in the present case, no such relief has been claimed. Here the plaintiffs come with a case that despite being continued as employee, they are not being allowed to work, it is not the case that they are seeking any injunction against any contemplated or apprehended removal from service. In such circumstnaces, the judgment in Adarsh Vidhya Mandir

Samiti's case does not help the petitioner.

Learned counsel read to me the entire plaint, in my view, none of the reliefs claimed in the plaint fall within Section 18 or Section 10 of the Rajasthan Non-

Government Educational Institutions Act, as such, I do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order.

The revision petition is, therefore, dismissed summarily.

( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.