Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT KANTA DEVI versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT KANTA DEVI v STATE - CRLMP Case No. 1643 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 5135 (24 October 2007)

CMP 1643/07

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1643/07

Smt. Kanta Devi Versus State & Anr.

DATE OF ORDER :: 24/10/2007

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Mr. Prahlad Sharma, for petitioner

Mr. Arun Sharma, Public Prosecutor for State

***

Instant petition has been filed assailing the order dt.23rd July, 2007 whereby application of petitioner filed u/s.190(1) read with Section 319

Cr.P.C. was rejected by learned trial Judge.

Complainant-petitioner filed a written report on 14th April, 2007 in which FIR bearing No.87/07 was registered at Police Station Chaksu for the offence u/ss.143, 341, 323 & 379 IPC and after investigation, the Investigating Officer filed challan against Smt. Teeja Devi u/ss.341 & 323

IPC. Petitioner at this stage filed application u/s.319 of the Code and made a request that

Investigating Officer has committed an error in not filing challan against other co-accused who were specifically named in FIR and so also in the statements which were recorded during investigation u/s.161 Cr.P.C. Learned trial Judge after taking into consideration the material has specifically observed that since evidence is yet to be recorded and in the statements recorded

CMP 1643/07 u/s.161 Cr.P.C. of Shanker S/o Ramnarain & Hari

Narain S/o Panchu Ram, both have specifically named Teeja Devi against whom cognizance has been taken - as such has not considered appropriate to take cognizance against other co-accused as requested by petitioner.

This Court has gone through the order impugned and does not find any infirmity therein which may call for interference.

Consequently, the misc. petition fails and is hereby dismissed. [AJAY RASTOGI],J.

FRBOHRA,JR.P.A.1643CMP2007 24-10.doc


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.