Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


SOHAN LAL & ANR. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 5204 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 5377 (13 November 2007)

S.B.Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.5204/2007

(Sohan Lal & Anr. vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : November 13, 2007


Mr.R.K.Bohra, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public

Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have no role in commission of the crime.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that under the garb of entering into the compromise, the petitioners and others have taken a sum of

Rs.2,00,000/- from the first informant and did not execute the compromise.

Keeping in view the serious allegations and the question of recovery of Rs.2,00,000/- is involved, which alleged to have been taken by deceitful means, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, on the contrary in such matters, custodial interrogation is necessary.

The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.