Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TEJMAL & ORS. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


TEJMAL & ORS. v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 5039 of 2007 [2007] RD-RJ 5481 (19 November 2007)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.5039/2007

(Tejmal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of order : November 19, 2007

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

None present, for the petitioners.

Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State.

No one appears for the petitioners.

Heard learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned Public Prosecutor has received the case diary.

He submits that the case was found against co-accused Jai

Singh against whom, the police has already filed the challan.

So far as present petitioners are concerned, no case is found against them. There is no ground to arrest them.

In view of the statement of the learned Public

Prosecutor, the bail application under section 438 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous since there is no accusation against the present petitioners. The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.