NARAYANI versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

NARAYANI v UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - CW Case No. 1496 of 2006 [2007] RD-RJ 594 (29 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL WRIT No. 1496 of 2006

NARAYANI

V/S

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Mr. TS CHAMPAWAT, for the appellant / petitioner

Mr. VK MATHUR, for the respondent

Date of Order : 29.1.2007

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere to hold that the notification Annex.-3 is ultra-vires. The controversy, as to whether 'Bagaria' is Scheduled Caste or not, cannot be gone into in view of the fact that the notification is issued by the Parliament in accordance with the procedure prescribed in Part XIV of the Constitution, and inquiry in this regard is strictly prohibited by the series of judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed summarily.

( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.