Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P. DURAISAMY versus THE SECRETARY

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P. Duraisamy v. The Secretary - Writ Petition No.15287 of 2005 [2005] RD-TN 588 (17 August 2005)



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 17/08/2005

Coram

THE HON'BLE MR. MARKANDEY KATJU, THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. KULASEKARAN Writ Petition No.15287 of 2005

P. Duraisamy .. Petitioner -Vs-

1. The Secretary,

State Government of

Tamil Nadu,

Home (Transport) Department,

Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2. The Regional Transport Authority,

Coimbatore South Region,

Coimbatore.

3. The Regional Transport Authority,

Tiruppur Region, Tiruppur.

4. The Regional Transport Officer,

Tiruppur.

5. The Regional Transport Officer,

Coimbatore South, Coimbatore.

6. The Managing Director,

Tamil Nadu State Transport

Corporation, Coimbatore. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 to 5 from implementing the variations granted in favour of the individual operators between the period January 1996 to May 1996 in the District of Coimbatore taking into consideration the convenience of the travelling public with reference to the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2005. For petitioner : Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan

For respondents: Mr. V.Raghupathy

Govt. Pleader

Mr. Palani

:ORDER



(Order of the Court was made by

The Honourable The Chief Justice)

The petitioner's grievance is against the variation of permit conditions by order of the Regional Transport Authority, Coimbatore.

2. Every order of the Regional Transport Authority can be challenged by way of appeal/revision under Section 89/90 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). Hence this petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. If such an appeal/revision is filed we hope and trust that the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned. If any such appeal/revision is filed under Section 89/90 of the Act within three weeks from today, the same will be entertained without raising any objection as to limitation and shall be decided expeditiously thereafter. The Regional Transport Authority shall supply certified copy of all the proceedings varying the permit conditions if the petitioner approaches for the same. W.P.M.P.No.16629 of 2005 is closed. Index:Yes

Internet:Yes

Vu

To

1. The Secretary,

State Government of

Tamil Nadu,

Home (Transport) Department,

Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2. The Regional Transport Authority,

Coimbatore South Region,

Coimbatore.

3. The Regional Transport Authority,

Tiruppur Region, Tiruppur.

4. The Regional Transport Officer,

Tiruppur.

5. The Regional Transport Officer,

Coimbatore South, Coimbatore.

6. The Managing Director,

Tamil Nadu State Transport

Corporation, Coimbatore.




Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.