Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ADHAVAN PROCESSORS versus MANAGING DIRECTOR

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Adhavan Processors v. Managing Director - WRIT APPEAL No.2185 of 2003 [2007] RD-TN 1004 (20 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS



DATED: 20.03.2007

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM

AND

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.2185 of 2003

and

WAMP. No.3113 of 2003

Adhavan Processors Private Ltd.,

rep. by its Director S. Selvarajan

Suriyampalayam

Chithode P.O.

Erode 638 102. ..Appellant Vs

1. The Managing Director

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road

Egmore

Chennai 600 008.

2. The Special Tahsildar (Recovery)

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road

Egmore,

Chennai 600 008. ..Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of His Lordship Mr. Justice N.V. Balasubramanian in W.P.No.16356 of 2003 dated 10.06.2003. For appellant : Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan,Sr.Counsel for Ms. AL. Gandhimathi

For respondents : Mr. P.S. Sethuraman

JUDGMENT



(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P. SATHASIVAM,J.) The above writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 10.06.2003 made in W.P.No.16356 of 2003, in and by which the learned Judge dismissed the writ petition with an observation.

2. Heard Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan, learned senior counsel for the appellant and Mr. P.S. Sethuraman, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. It is brought to our notice that the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition after finding that the proceedings have been closed by the B.I.F.R. and no proceedings were pending on the date when the impugned order was passed. In view of the same it is stated that the petitioner filed appropriate petition before the B.I.F.R., which was dismissed by the said authority. It is also stated that against the order of B.I.F.R. now the appellant has preferred an appeal in Appeal No.10 of 2007 before A.A.I.F.R. The learned senior counsel has also brought to our notice the said appeal has been registered and the same will be heard by the said authority on 06.02.2007. According to him, the said appeal is still pending on the file of the said authority. In view of the same, we are of the view that no adjudication is required in this writ appeal, except the respondents are permitted to take further action depending on the outcome in the appeal.

with the above observation, the writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected WAMP., is closed. kh

To

1. The Managing Director

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road

Egmore

Chennai 600 008.

2. The Special Tahsildar (Recovery)

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road

Egmore

Chennai 600 008.

[PRV/9936]


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.