Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.MUTHUAKSHMI versus V.K.RAJA

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.Muthuakshmi v. V.K.Raja - Writ Appeal No.3291 of 2004 [2007] RD-TN 1268 (3 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS



Dated: 03.04.2007

Coram

The Honourable Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM

and

The Honourable Mr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN

Writ Appeal No.3291 of 2004

and

WAMP No.6206 of 2004

P.Muthuakshmi ..Appellant Vs

1. V.K.Raja

2. The Collector,

Dindigul District,

Dindigul.

3. The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office,

Dindigul.

4. The Municipal Surveyor,

Dindigul Municipality,

Dindigul. ..Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 21.11.2003 made in W.P.No.33741 of 2003. For Appellant : Mr.K.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.P.Subramanian, Government Advocate JUDGMENT



(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P. SATHASIVAM, J.) The above writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 21.11.2003 made in W.P.No.33741 of 2003, in and by which, the learned Judge directed the Tahsildar, Dindigul, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.06.2003 in accordance with law take a decision thereon on or before 20.01.2004.

2. It is brought to our notice that in view of the stay order passed by this Court in WAMP No.6206 of 2004, the third respondent-Tahsildar, Dindigul, has not passed order till this date.

3. Considering the controversy and dispute, we are of the view that ends of justice would be met by directing the Tahsildar, Dindigul, to pass an order as directed by the learned single Judge, after notice to the appellant-P.Muthuakshmi, first respondent-V.K.Raja as well as the fourth respondent-the Municipal Surveyor, Dindigul Municipality, Dindigul, if their presence is required, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. The writ appeal is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, WAMP No.6206 of 2004 is closed.

raa To

1. The Collector,

Dindigul District,

Dindigul.

2. The Tahsildar,

Taluk Office,

Dindigul.

3. The Municipal Surveyor,

Dindigul Municipality,

Dindigul.

[PRV/10128]


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.