Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DY COMMR versus VAGHINI OIL

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dy Commr v. Vaghini Oil - WA.No.3258 of 2004 [2007] RD-TN 1285 (4 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS



Date:- 04.04.2007

Coram

The Honourable Mr. Justice P. SATHASIVAM

and

The Honourable Mr. Justice S. TAMILVANAN

W.A. No.3258 of 2004

and

W.A.M.P. No.6143 of 2004

1. The Deputy Commissioner,

Civil Supplies and Consumer

Protection Department,

City (South)

Periyar Thidal, Vepery,

Chennai  600 007.

2. The Assistant Commissioner,

Civil Supplies and Consumer

Protection Department,

Tambaram Zone,

Chennai  600 045.

3. The Inspector of Police,

Civil Supplies CID,

51, Soundaraya Colony,

Thirumangalam,

Chennai  600 101. ... Appellants ..Vs..

Vaghini Oil Agency,

rep. by its Partner,

B. Saraswathy ... Respondent Appeal to set aside the order dated 30.12.2002 passed in W.P. No.46662 of 2002 on the file of this Court. For Appellant : Mr. P. Subramanian, Govt. Advocate For Respondents : N.A.

JUDGMENT



(Judgment was delivered by P. SATHASIVAM, J.)

The above writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 30.12.2002 made in W.P. No.46662 of 2002, in and by which, the learned Judge allowed the writ petition as prayed for.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. The respondent, though duly served notice from this Court, is not contesting the appeal, by engaging a counsel.

3. It is not in dispute that the learned Judge, based on a decision reported in the case of V. KATHIRVELU AND ANOTHER v. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ETC. (2001 WRIT LAW REPORTER 208), allowed the writ petition. Learned Government Advocate fairly admits that the writ appeal filed against the said decision viz. 2001 Writ Law Reporter 208 also dismissed by the Division Bench on 15.3.2007 in Writ Appeal Nos.2917 and 2918 of 2002.

4. In view of the fact that the order passed in 2001 Writ Law Reporter 208 is confirmed by the Division Bench and the fact that no amendment has been made so far in the Rule covering dealers dealing in white kerosene under Parallel Marketing System, we are of the view that the order of the learned Single Judge, which is impugned, cannot be faulted. Accordingly, the writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed. Consequently, the connected W.A.M.P. is closed. No costs. ssa


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.