Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.RAMACHANDRAN versus CMDA

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.Ramachandran v. CMDA - WP.No.802 of 2007 [2007] RD-TN 244 (22 January 2007)


In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated: 22.01.2007

Coram:

The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR


Writ Petition No.802 of 2007


1.A. Ramachandran
2.D. Balasubramanian
3.Sundaram Kumar ..Petitioners


..vs..


1. The Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority rep. By its Member Secretary
No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road
Egmore
Chennai 8.

2. The Corporation of Chennai
rep. By its Commissioner
113 Rippon Building
Periamet, Chennai 600 003.

3. Nizar Ahamed ..Respondents


Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus as stated therein.


For Petitioners : Mr. K. Sakthivel

For Respondents : Mr. J. Ravindran for R.1
Mr. G.T. Subramaniyan for R.2
Mrs. Hema Sampath
for Mr. S. Venkateswaran for R.3

ORDER



(Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM,J.) The petitioners have filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take action and demolish the violated portions of the building put up by the third respondent at No.10, Third Avenue, Beasant Nagar, Chennai 600 090.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondents.

3. It is brought to our notice that the first respondent as early as on 22.08.2006 directed the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, second respondent herein to inspect and take necessary action against the construction/demolition of the construction based on the complaint made by the petitioners against the third respondent. It is the further grievance of the petitioner that in spite of the said direction, the second respondent has not taken any action against the third respondent till this date. Taking note of the above aspects, the second respondent is directed to inspect the premises of the third respondent viz., No.10, Third Avenue, Beasant Nagar, Chennai 600 090, and take necessary action if there is any violation/deviation, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to him (R.3). The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. kh

To

1.The Member Secretary

Chennai Metropolitan Development

Authority

No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road

Egmore

Chennai 8.

2.The Commissioner

Corporation of Chennai

113 Rippon Building

Periamet, Chennai 600 003.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.