Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

B.MARAGATHAMANI versus MEMBER SECRETARY CMDA

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


B.Maragathamani v. Member Secretary CMDA - WP.No.2484 of 2007 [2007] RD-TN 247 (22 January 2007)


In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated: 22.01.2007

Coram:

The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAM
and
The Honourable Mr.Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR


Writ Petition No.2484 of 2007
and
MP.No.1 of 2007


Mrs. B. Maragathamani ..Petitioner


..vs..


The Member Secretary
Chennai Metropolitan Development
Authority, Egmore
Chennai 8. ..Respondent


Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus as stated therein.

For Petitioner : Mr. S. Sundaresan

For Respondent : Mr. J. Ravindran


ORDER



(Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM,J.) The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to issue orders of Regularisation as per their Letter No.REG/C6/52573/2000 dated 12.08.2002 and release the regularisation approval plan to the petitioner building situated at S.No.205/4A, 205/5A & 205/10, bearing Door No.18/4, East Coast Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041.

2. On direction, Mr. J. Ravindran, takes notice for the respondent.

3. In view of the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Consumer Action Group vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2006 (4) CTC 483) and in the light of the assertion of the petitioner that the building in question was constructed prior to the cut-off date i.e., 28.02.1999, the petitioner is free to make an application/representation, enclosing the required details to the respondent within a period of two weeks from today. If any such representation/application is made, it is for the respondent to take a decision in accordance with law, more particularly in the light of the Division Bench decision referred to above. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. kh

To

The Member Secretary

Chennai Metropolitan Development

Authority, Egmore

Chennai 8


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.