Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DYSTAR versus COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dystar v. Commercial Tax Officer - Writ Petition No.29249 of 2007 [2007] RD-TN 2930 (7 September 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS



DATED: 07.09.2007

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.29249 of 2007

Dystar (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Rep. by its Company Secretary and Head of Finance & Administration C.G. Ramamurthi

No.40

Bodichetty Street

Cuddalore 607 002 ..Petitioner Vs

1. The Commercial Tax Officer (FAC)

Cuddalore Town

Cuddalore

2. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT)

Cuddalore

3. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench) represented by its Secretary

City Civil Court Buildings

Chennai 600 104. ..Respondents This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the third respondent in T.P.No.38/07 in T.A.No.155/07, dated 14.8.2007, and quash the same while directing the third respondent herein to re-dispose the stay petition in respect of the assessment year 2004-05. For petitioner : Mr.N.Inbarajan

For respondents : Mr.R.Mahadevan, Additional Government Pleader O R D E R



Mr.R.Mahadevan, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents.

2. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.

3. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if further time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the order of the third respondent, dated 14.8.2007, made in T.P.No.38/07 in T.A.No.155/07.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court granting further time to the petitioner to comply with the order passed by the third respondent, as prayed for.

5. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, further time of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order is granted to the petitioner to comply with the order of the third respondent, dated 14.8.2007, made in T.P.No.38/07 in T.A.No.155/07.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.No.1 of 2007 is closed. lan

To

1. The Commercial Tax Officer (FAC)

Cuddalore Town

Cuddalore.

2. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT)

Cuddalore.

3. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench) represented by its Secretary

City Civil Court Buildings

Chennai 600 104.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.