Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.N.CHANDRASEKARAN versus CHAIRMAN

High Court of Madras

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.N.Chandrasekaran v. Chairman - W.P. No.8940 of 2007 [2007] RD-TN 967 (15 March 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS



Dated : 15.03.2007

Coram

The Honourable Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM

and

The Honourable Mr. Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR

W.P. No.8940 of 2007

and

M.P. No.1 of 2007

M.N.Chandrasekaran ..Petitioner Vs

1. The Chairman,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

Anna Salai,

Chennai 2.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director,

Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pump House Road,

Chintadripet,

Chennai 2. ..Respondents

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents from disconnecting the electricity connection and water and sewerage connections to the petitioner's property bearing No.140, Amman Koil St., Peddunaickenpet, George Town, Chennai 79. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Ravichandran For R 1 : Mr.J.Ravindran

For R 2 : Mr.K.Elango

O R D E R



( Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM, J.) On direction, Mr.J.Ravindran, learned counsel takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.K.Elango for the second respondent.

2. According to the petitioner, in a writ petition filed by one C.V.Balasubramane in W.P.No.47493 of 2006, in which the present petitioner was impleaded as fifth respondent, this Court by order dated 05.01.2007 directed the second respondent therein, viz., the Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, to consider and dispose of the revised plan submitted on 22.12.2006 in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. In the same order, this Court observed that depending on the order to be passed by the second respondent therein, the concerned authority is free to proceed further, if the same is warranted.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in this petition no order or decision has been taken by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority as directed in the earlier order dated 05.01.2007. Further the officials of the respondents, on 06.03.2007, came to the petitioner's premises and threatened him to disconnect Electricity and Water connection. This has been specifically stated in paragraph No.3 of the affidavit. In such circumstances and in view of our earlier order dated 05.01.2007 in W.P.No.47493 of 2006, the respondents herein not to disconnect Electricity and Water supply, till final decision being taken by the Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority as directed in the earlier writ petition. The present writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. gms

To

1. The Chairman,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

Anna Salai,

Chennai 2.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director,

Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board, No.1, Pump House Road,

Chintadripet,

Chennai 2.

[PRV/10066]


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.