Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DHARAM SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dharam Singh v. Union Of India And Another - WRIT - A No. 32438 of 2003 [2003] RD-AH 238 (30 July 2003)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO.34

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 32438 of 2003

Dharam Singh ......... Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & Anr. ......... Respondents

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. D.P. Gupta, J.

This writ petition has been filed against the impugned transfer order dated 14.07.2003 (Annex.7), by which  the petitioner has been transferred from NOIDA to Rajahmundry.

The grounds for challenge of the transfer order are that the petitioner is a patient of Psychiatric and is under medical treatment; his wife is serving in Central Bank of India as Assistant Manager and living with him having a four years old school going child; his old parents  are also living with him and there is no body to look after them except the petitioner; his father is a chronic patient of Asthama and mother also remains sick; and due to illness of the petitioner, his wife looks after him.

The grievance raised in this petition are personal in nature and can not be examined in a writ jurisdiction, therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. However, for the redressal of his grievance, petitioner has already made a representation before the authority concerned. Thus, we request the authority concerned to decide his representation within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation, which the petitioner undertakes to file within one week or two.

For a period of three weeks, the impugned transfer, so far it relates to the petitioner, shall be kept in abeyance provided he had not already been relieved.

Shri B.N. Singh, Advocate, appeared for the respondents.

30.07.2003

AHA


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.