Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHEO PRASAD AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sheo Prasad And Another v. State Of U.P.And Others - WRIT - C No. 37911 of 2003 [2003] RD-AH 306 (3 September 2003)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO. 34

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 37911 OF 2003

Sheo Prasad & anr. ------ Petitioners

 Vs.

State of U.P. & ors. ------       Respondents

______

Hon'ble Dr. B.S.Chauhan, J

Hon'ble R.C. Pandey, J.

(By Hon'ble Dr. B.S.Chauhan, J.)

This writ petition has been filed, raising grievance that respondent no. 5 has acted illegally and arbitrarily in carving out the plots in the land of the petitioners and granting pattas in favour of respondent nos. 6 to 9. Against the same, an application has been filed by the petitioner before the learned District Collector (respondent no. 2), which has not yet been decided.

The Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-authorities has raised the preliminary objection that under the statutory provisions a revision is maintainable. Application filed by the petitioner contained in Annex. 5 to the writ petition, does not furnish any ground or explain fact situation, on the basis of which action can be taken. Thus, the petition cannot be entertained.

In Sheela Devi Vs. Jaspal Singh, (1999) 1 SCC 209, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that if statute provides for remedy of revision, writ cannot be entertained.

In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain the petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

If the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the appropriate forum by presenting the required memo of appeal/revision.

3.9.2003

AKSI


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.