Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SARDAR MELA SINGH AND OTHERS versus JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sardar Mela Singh And Others v. Joint Director Of Education And Others - WRIT - C No. 26014 of 2000 [2003] RD-AH 41 (20 March 2003)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO. 24

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO 26014 Of 2000

Sardar Mela Singh and others ----- Petitioners

Versus

Joint Director of Education,

Bareilly Region, Bareilly & others -----       Respondents.

--------------

Hon'ble Dr. B.S.Chauhan, J.

This writ petition has initially been filed challenging the election of the management committee held on 16.6.1999. As per the term of the clause (g) of the Scheme of Management the tenure of the duly elected committee is three years. During the pendency of this writ petition, term of the committee stood expired and a new committee of management has been elected on 4th June, 2002. It has been given recognition by the statutory authority vide order dated 17th June, 2002. Petitioners being aggrieved of the recognition to the newly elected management committee made a representation raising all their legal and factual grievances before the respondent no.1 which has not yet been disposed of.

Taking abundant caution petitioners have filed an application for amendment in this writ petition challenging the newly management committee. However, as their representation against the grant of recognition to the election of the newly elected management committee vide order dated 17th June, 2002 has not yet been disposed of by the learned respondent no.1, it is not desirable to entertain the application of amendment.

Thus, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous and the application for amendment is also dismissed with the direction to the respondent no. 1 to dispose of the representation/objection filed by the petitioners against the order dated 17th June, 2002 granting the recognition to the newly elected management committee, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of filing the certified copy of this order before him, and if possible, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. It is needless to say that the party aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent no. 1 shall have a right to resort to further legal action.

With these observations the writ petition is disposed of finally.

20.3.2003

AKSI


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.