Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DR. MANKIK CHAND KUSHWAHA versus U.P. NIBANDHAK & ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dr. Mankik Chand Kushwaha v. U.P. Nibandhak & Another - WRIT - C No. 314 of 1999 [2003] RD-AH 43 (21 March 2003)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO. 24

     

CIVIL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO 314 Of 1999

Dr. Manik Chand Kushwaha -----   Petitioner

Versus

U.P.Nibandhak Firms Societies Evam Chits,

District Alighar and another -----       Respondents.

--------------

Hon'ble Dr. B.S.Chauhan, J.

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by respondent no. 1 in favour of respondent no. 2 on 26.9.1998 recognising him as a Manager of the Society which has not been impleaded as a party.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nurul Huda, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

Be that as it may be, firstly, the writ petition is not maintainable for not impleading the Society, of which petitioner claims to be duly elected Manager under the Scheme of its administration. Secondly, even if the writ is maintainable, petitioner claims to have been duly elected as a Manager of the said Society on 28th March, 1998. He further claims that he had been elected for a period of 5 years. That period of 5 years is likely to expire on 27th March, 2003, i.e., in the next week. There is no interim relief passed in favour of the petitioner by this Court.

No interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner. Therefore, no purpose would be served by entertaining this writ petition, which has become infructuous by efflux of time.

The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

21.3.2003

AKSI


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.